Theories on Palin #2

I hate to beat a dead horse (or maverick, as the case may be), but I meant to mention this weeks before. Palin did not have a baby 6 months ago! It's true!

Here's what we know:

(1) When Palin announced her pregnancy (she was 5 months pregnant at announcement), Bristol was taken out of school for many months. The supposed diagnosis was mononucleosis.

(2) Palin was in Texas preparing to give a speech when her water broke. She stayed to give her speech, got on an airplane and flew to Alaska (with a layover in Washington), drove 45 more minutes to the hospital, and out came the baby.
A 12 hour (minimum) commute from Texas to hospital.

(3) Bristol had already arrived at the same hospital, supposedly awaiting her mother's arrival.

Conclusion: Either Sarah Palin had no intention on giving a live birth, or she wasn't going to have a baby and was wearing a fat suit.

You think that Bristol is now pregnant debunks my theory? Watch:

Bristol's pregnancy is announced 5 months into her gestation, and four months after Trig is born.

So, obviously (!), Sarah had progressive pregnant suits to simulate the increasing belly size of a pregnant woman. Then, when she was selected as the Republican running mate, they had to do some quick thinking to quash the existing rumors of the unwed daughter-mother. So Bristol then adopted her mother's SAME pregnant suits, the Republicans made the big announcement of the new budding family and unsuccessfully attempted to make roses out of huge pile of shit.

And now it appears that Sarah P. has debunked the theory of her pregnant daughter BY MAKING HER DAUGHTER APPEAR PREGNANT! "See? Trig isn't Bristol's baby, because Bristol is pregnant now!" And you can't be five months pregnant if you had a baby four months ago. Unless your mom already has the fat suit to wear.

It's all so obvious, I don't know why this hasn't become common knowledge already.